Avoiding Old Growth in Alaska- Sealaska and Forest Service
Here are two stories about Alaska, thanks to Forest Business Network.
First, this piece by Catherine Mater in the Juneau Empire, in which she talks about young growth and becoming “Siuslaw-like”.
From this piece from KTOO, Sealaska is going to sell carbon credits instead of/in addition to logs from its land in Alaska.
Alaska was invited to participate in the California cap-and-trade market in 2015 after lobbying from the Chugach Alaska Corporation. Chugach is also working on developing its own carbon offset credits. (Creative Commons photo by Xa’at)
Big greenhouse gas emitters in California are now able to buy carbon offset credits based in Alaska. The Southeast regional Native corporation Sealaska is using some of its lands for carbon sequestration. Thousands of acres of old growth trees will stay intact for over 100 years. It’s the first carbon bank in the state to be approved for the market.
Sealaska says its another way of securing a future for shareholders.
The corporation is expected to make money for its shareholders. But it’s already cut close to a third of its trees, and not all of the sites left are ideal for logging, like old growth stands next to salmon streams.
So, Mallott says the corporation faced a challenge. How do you protect those sensitive areas and still make money for shareholders?
“It was really the need to stretch our harvest and diminish our harvest from a higher level that put us in this framework thinking, ‘OK, what really is sustainability for Sealaska?” Mallott said.
Enter the California cap-and-trade program.
Basically, big polluters in the Golden State receive an allowance to release a planned amount of carbon each year. To account for each metric ton of carbon, companies can use that allowance or buy carbon offset credits. Those credits represent an actual, tangible thing: carbon stored in trees — in this case, trees belonging to Sealaska.
Mallott says carbon sequestration looked like the right opportunity. The money generated would help shareholders and nearly half of the trees on Sealaska land could stay in the ground.
He’s quick to point out this land isn’t locked up. The corporation can can still develop parcels for tourism or mineral exploration.
He says the project has already attracted a buyer. It’s too early to put a dollar figure on the deal. But he thinks the amount could be huge.
“Multiple millions,” Mallott said. “The financial benefit of this is very significant for Sealaska.”
In the past, conservation groups have been critical of the rate Sealaska has clear cut its forests.
Buck Lindekugel is a grass roots attorney for the Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, and he says that old model of logging doesn’t make sense for the region’s economy today. He welcomes the corporation’s new venture.
“We’re excited that Sealaska is seizing this opportunity to explore those options,” Lindekugel said. “We think it’s good for their shareholders, and it’s certainly good for all of us who care about the forest.”
But Mallott says Sealaska has always cared about sustainability and the bottom line.
“The carbon project. Is it a shift? It’s a recognition in the way we’ve always thought,” Mallott said.
He says the corporation isn’t going to stop logging on its remaining land. But it’s also planning to allocate more acreage to carbon sequestration in the near future.
As for what happens to the trees after the 110 years is up, Mallott says that’s up to a younger generation to decide.
via A New Century of Forest Planning https://ift.tt/YeNBM9